Torture Meaning In Hindi
Torture Meaning In Hindi. Look through examples of torture translation in sentences, listen to pronunciation and learn grammar. Torture meaning in hindi is यातना.
The relation between a sign that is meaningful and its interpretation is called"the theory or meaning of a sign. Here, we'll be discussing the problems with truth conditional theories of meaning, Grice's analysis on speaker-meaning and that of Tarski's semantic theorem of truth. We will also analyze arguments against Tarski's theory of truth.
Arguments against truth-conditional theories of meaning
Truth-conditional theories about meaning argue that meaning is a function of the elements of truth. But, this theory restricts significance to the language phenomena. The argument of Davidson is that truth-values might not be the truth. This is why we must be able distinguish between truth and flat assertion.
It is the Epistemic Determination Argument is an attempt to establish truth-conditional theories for meaning. It is based upon two basic assumptions: the existence of all non-linguistic facts and the understanding of the truth-condition. However, Daniel Cohnitz has argued against these assumptions. This argument therefore has no merit.
Another common concern in these theories is the incredibility of meaning. But this is addressed through mentalist analysis. This is where meaning is evaluated in terms of a mental representation, rather than the intended meaning. For example one person could get different meanings from the words when the person is using the same word in the context of two distinct contexts however the meanings of the terms can be the same if the speaker is using the same phrase in two different contexts.
Although the majority of theories of meaning attempt to explain significance in the terms of content in mentality, non-mentalist theories are occasionally pursued. It could be due the skepticism towards mentalist theories. They may also be pursued from those that believe mental representation should be assessed in terms of the representation of language.
Another important defender of this view One of the most prominent defenders is Robert Brandom. He believes that the purpose of a statement is determined by its social surroundings as well as that speech actions which involve sentences are appropriate in its context in that they are employed. Therefore, he has created a pragmatics model to explain sentence meanings using socio-cultural norms and normative positions.
Grice's analysis of speaker-meaning
Grice's analysis to understand speaker-meaning places significant emphasis on the utterer's intent and its relationship to the significance to the meaning of the sentence. He asserts that intention can be a mental state with multiple dimensions that must be considered in order to determine the meaning of an expression. This analysis, however, violates speaker centrism because it examines U meaning without M-intentions. Furthermore, Grice fails to account for the reality that M-intentions can be only limited to two or one.
Further, Grice's study does not take into account some important cases of intuitional communication. For instance, in the photograph example of earlier, the individual speaking does not specify whether the subject was Bob or his wife. This is an issue because Andy's photo does not reveal the fact that Bob nor his wife is unfaithful , or faithful.
While Grice is correct in that speaker meaning is more fundamental than sentence-meaning, there is some debate to be had. In fact, the distinction is vital to the naturalistic acceptance of non-natural meaning. Indeed, the purpose of Grice's work is to offer naturalistic explanations for such non-natural meaning.
To fully comprehend a verbal act one must comprehend the speaker's intention, and this is an intricate embedding of intents and beliefs. But, we seldom draw complex inferences about mental states in simple exchanges. In the end, Grice's assessment regarding speaker meaning is not compatible with the actual cognitive processes involved in language understanding.
Although Grice's theory of speaker-meaning is a plausible description about the processing, it is still far from comprehensive. Others, such as Bennett, Loar, and Schiffer, have come up with more thorough explanations. These explanations make it difficult to believe the validity to the Gricean theory, because they consider communication to be an activity rational. In essence, audiences are conditioned to trust what a speaker has to say as they comprehend the speaker's intentions.
It does not account for all types of speech actions. Grice's analysis fails to consider the fact that speech acts are often employed to explain the meaning of a sentence. The result is that the value of a phrase is limited to its meaning by its speaker.
The semantic theory of Tarski's is not working. of truth
While Tarski believes that sentences are truth bearers but this doesn't mean any sentence has to be truthful. In fact, he tried to define what constitutes "true" in a specific context. The theory is now a central part of modern logic and is classified as a deflationary or correspondence theory.
The problem with the concept to be true is that the concept cannot be applied to natural languages. This problem is caused by Tarski's undefinability hypothesis, which says that no bivalent language could contain its own predicate. Even though English might seem to be an in the middle of this principle but this is in no way inconsistent in Tarski's opinion that natural languages are semantically closed.
Nonetheless, Tarski leaves many implicit restrictions on his theories. For example the theory cannot contain false statements or instances of the form T. Also, a theory must avoid what is known as the Liar paradox. Another drawback with Tarski's theory is that it isn't as logical as the work of traditional philosophers. In addition, it's impossible to explain every aspect of truth in terms of ordinary sense. This is an issue for any theory on truth.
Another issue is that Tarski's definitions of truth requires the use of notions from set theory and syntax. These aren't suitable when looking at endless languages. The style of language used by Henkin is sound, but it doesn't match Tarski's notion of truth.
A definition like Tarski's of what is truth also insufficient because it fails to make sense of the complexity of the truth. In particular, truth is not able to play the role of a predicate in an interpretation theory and Tarski's axioms cannot explain the nature of primitives. Further, his definition on truth is not consistent with the concept of truth in terms of meaning theories.
However, these difficulties cannot stop Tarski applying his definition of truth, and it doesn't have to be classified as a satisfaction definition. In fact, the proper definition of truth isn't so clear and is dependent on specifics of object-language. If you'd like to learn more about this, you can read Thoralf Skolem's 1919 essay.
The problems with Grice's approach to sentence-meaning
The problems with Grice's analysis of sentence meaning can be summarized in two main areas. First, the intention of the speaker must be recognized. Additionally, the speaker's speech is to be supported by evidence that supports the desired effect. However, these conditions cannot be being met in every instance.
This issue can be addressed with the modification of Grice's method of analyzing sentences to incorporate the meaning of sentences which do not possess intentionality. This analysis is also based on the idea that sentences are highly complex entities that are composed of several elements. As such, the Gricean analysis is not able to capture examples that are counterexamples.
This assertion is particularly problematic as it relates to Grice's distinctions of meaning of the speaker and sentence. This distinction is fundamental to any naturalistically sound account of sentence-meaning. This theory is also vital in the theory of conversational implicature. This theory was developed in 2005. Grice proposed a starting point for a theoretical understanding of the meaning, which the author further elaborated in subsequent papers. The core concept behind the concept of meaning in Grice's work is to examine the speaker's intent in determining what the speaker intends to convey.
Another problem with Grice's analysis is that it doesn't consider intuitive communication. For example, in Grice's example, it's unclear what Andy intends to mean when he claims that Bob is unfaithful and unfaithful to wife. There are many counterexamples of intuitive communication that cannot be explained by Grice's argument.
The main argument of Grice's study is that the speaker must be aiming to trigger an emotion in audiences. But this claim is not strictly based on philosophical principles. Grice fixes the cutoff point with respect to contingent cognitive capabilities of the interlocutor and the nature of communication.
Grice's theory of sentence-meaning is not very plausible, though it's a plausible account. Others have provided more thorough explanations of the meaning, but they are less plausible. In addition, Grice views communication as a rational activity. Audiences reason to their beliefs by observing the message of the speaker.
T.) to punish with torture; How to say torture in hindi. Looking for the meaning of torture in hindi?
Know To Torture Meaning In Hindi And Translation In Hindi.
The act of causing great physical or mental pain in order to persuade someone to do something or…. Torture is a noun by form. Look through examples of torture translation in sentences, listen to pronunciation and learn grammar.
And Torturing And Killing Young Women.
The torture at times used to be unbearable. Get meaning and translation of torture in hindi language with grammar,antonyms,synonyms and sentence usages by shabdkhoj. Torture meaning in hindi is यातना.
Looking For The Meaning Of Torture In Hindi?
Find the definition of tortured in hindi. Over 100,000 hindi translations of english words and phrases. Torture का हिंदी में मतलब.torture meaning in hindi with examples
Torture Word Meaning With Their Sentences, Usage, Synonyms, Antonyms, Narrower Meaning And Related Word Meaning
How to say torture in hindi. Torture meaning in hindi | torture का हिंदी में अर्थ | explained torture in hindi मैं अपनी videos में जो माइक, कैमरा और. Know the meaning of the tortured word in hindi with this amazing online english to hindi dictionary.
Know Answer Of Question :.
Tortured is an english word that is translated in hindi and carries a lot more. Hindustani is the native language of people living in delhi, haryana, uttar. Torture meaning in hindi :
Post a Comment for "Torture Meaning In Hindi"